Dodge Dart Forum banner

Why Dodge should make the Dart look like a baby Charger

5.2K views 17 replies 10 participants last post by  pitajr  
#1 ·
Image


The Dodge Dart set an all-time sales record in April, and so far this year, the compact sedan is moving off dealer lots 52 percent faster than it was the year before.

So, if you’re Dodge, do you need to fix a car that’s doing those things three years after its launch?

Why, yes. Yes, you do.

According to Dodge’s five-year product plan that it presented in May 2014, the Dart will be “renewed” in 2016 for the 2017 model year.

The next-generation Dart will get a modified powertrain, including a more fuel-efficient nine-speed transmission and an upgraded 2.0-liter I-4 that is codenamed “Hurricane.” Both upgrades are needed, to improve Dart’s fuel economy and the sluggish power of the current 2.0-liter I-4.

But I think that Dodge’s biggest opportunity with Dart lies is in its exterior styling. To me, Dodge’s new mission -- as Fiat Chrysler’s in-house affordable performance brand -- ought to serve as the framework around which the next-generation Dart is built.

Let me explain.

Right now, six cars dominate the compact segment: Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic, Chevy Cruze, Hyundai Elantra, Ford Focus and Nissan Sentra. That’s actually a very generous reading, because in reality, Corolla dominates the segment with a 16.5 percent market share through April, while Civic and the others leaders trail far behind.

Dart, despite its relative recent success, has sold 33,686 units through April -- good enough for only a 4.5 percent market share in the crowded 17-car segment. That’s far better than where it was during the same period last year, when Dart’s segment share stood at just 3.1 percent. Neither figure is enough to feel good about its sales performance.

I think the issue with Dart is not the tough segment competition, but the fact that that it ought to be styled like more of a true Dodge than it is. It needs to stand out in that crowded field, and to do that, it needs to look more like a shrunken Dodge Charger, especially from the side.

Since I first saw Dart in December 2011, I have thought that it had a distinctive nose and tail, but that from the side, it looked like everything else in the segment, which is to say, plain and unremarkable. The nose and tail screamed baby Charger -- and moreso after Charger’s latest refresh late last year -- but Dart’s current design lost that look from the side.

I’m not asking for much here, just to ape the Charger’s distinctive door scallops and maybe its broad shoulder line to give the Dart more of a presence.

It’s not realistic to think that the Dart, even after an update next year, is going to “out-Toyota” the Corolla, or “out-Honda” the Civic. Those cars lead the compact sedan segment every year because they do what they are intended to do, and do it very well.

But there are consumers out there who long to stand out, who want something distinctive and over-the-top.

And I think a restyled Dart that looks like a baby Charger would fit that bill perfectly.

Source: Why Dodge should make the next Dart look like a baby Charger
 
#5 ·
I like the darts current looks...I dont want a mini-charger....
 
#6 ·
The Dart has a sleek Euro look to it, as opposed to the distinctly "American Muscle" look of the Charger. It would be a shame if they restyled the Dart to look like that, if you ask me. Also, anybody who can't tell the difference between a Dart, a Civic, a Corolla, and a Sentra probably doesn't care that much what their car looks like anyway.
 
#15 · (Edited)
All I am going to say to you guys is that turbos were meant to eat gas by their very design: Massive air-flow + increased gas flow = higher hp. Of course, putting a turbo on a 4-cylinder will generally get you better mpg than any V8 engine. Gearing makes a big difference too, but then again are we talking about making these cars stay at 65-70 mph, or winding them out? Even my modded VW gets 24 mpg at 70 mph and 42 mpg at 55-57 mph...
 
#16 ·
But only when they are under boost otherwise they are they are the same as an equivalent sized naturally aspirated motor and in most cases better because they can be designed for better off boost mileage because they do not need to be able produce adequate naturally aspirated power to move the vehicle, the turbo takes care of that.

In my 30 years of driving turbo cars I would say close to 90% of the time the car is not in boost so overall it has little impact on mileage.
 
#18 ·
But only when they are under boost otherwise they are they are the same as an equivalent sized naturally aspirated motor and in most cases better because they can be designed for better off boost mileage because they do not need to be able produce adequate naturally aspirated power to move the vehicle, the turbo takes care of that. In my 30 years of driving turbo cars I would say close to 90% of the time the car is not in boost so overall it has little impact on mileage.
thank you. Most people don't understand this and it is annoying to continuously explain it over and over.